Marx: Theory of History

Marx knew that revolutionaries needed a new theory of history. So he took the best theory of history then available, that of Hegel, and he stood it on its head. The result was a new theory of history as summarized by Marx in his preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy written in 1859.

Marx begins with social class, the relation of people to the means of production: "In the social production of their existence, men inevitably enter into definite relations, which are independent of their will, namely relations of production appropriate to a given stage in the development of their material forces of production. The totality of these relations of production constitutes the economic structure of society, the real foundation, on which arises a legal and political superstructure and to which correspond definite forms of social consciousness. The mode of production of material life conditions the general process of social, political and intellectual life."

Psychological consciousness is very important, but it can only be understood in the context of social class: "It is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but their social existence that determines their consciousness."

Historical change, in the view of Marx, arises out of conflict and contradiction: "At a certain stage of development, the material productive forces of society come into conflict with the existing relations of production or - this merely expresses the same thing in legal terms - with the property relations within the framework of which they have operated hitherto. From forms of development of the productive forces these relations turn into their fetters. Then begins an era of social revolution. The changes in the economic foundation lead sooner or later to the transformation of the whole immense superstructure."

To understand history you need to study both economics and psychology/sociology: "In studying such transformations it is always necessary to distinguish between the material transformation of the economic conditions of production, which can be determined with the precision of natural science, and the legal, political, religious, artistic or philosophic - in short, ideological forms in which men become conscious of this conflict and fight it out. Just as one does not judge an individual by what he thinks about himself, so one cannot judge such a period of transformation by its consciousness, but, on the contrary, this consciousness must be explained from the contradictions of material life, from the conflict existing between the social forces of production and the relations of production."

Economics must not be neglected. In fact, Marx spent most of his life in the British Library studying economic data: "No social order is ever destroyed before all the productive forces for which it is sufficient have been developed, and new superior relations of production never replace older ones before the material conditions for their existence have matured within the framework of the old society. Mankind thus inevitably sets itself only such tasks as it is able to solve, since closer examination will always show that the problem itself arises only when the material conditions for its solution are already present or at least in the course of formation."

With his new theory of history in mind, Marx considers that capitalism is the latest in a line of systems, and it is ripe for revolutionary transformation into socialism: "In broad outline, the Asiatic, ancient, feudal and modern bourgeois modes of production may be designated as epochs marking progress in the economic development of society. The bourgeois mode of production is the last antagonistic form of the social process of production — antagonistic not in the sense of individual antagonism but of an antagonism that emanates from the individuals' social conditions of existence - but the productive forces developing within bourgeois society create also the material conditions for a solution of this antagonism. The prehistory of human society accordingly closes with this social formation."

To take part in a discussion about this page, go to the Forum on Writings of Karl Marx on the Discussion Board: