|
Mao on Violence and the Military, 1966 | Its relation to a Culture of Peace for the 21st Century |
Sources Marx and Engels: Marx and Engels: Engels: Engels: Marx, Engels, Lenin: Lenin: Lenin: Trotsky: Mao: Mao and Fidel: Guevara: Hall and Winston: Fanon: Cabral: National Liberation and Culture
|
He was not afraid of another world war. In the chapter on war and peace he says, "The First World War was followed by the birth of the Soviet Union with a population of 200 million. The Second World War was followed by the emergence of the socialist camp with a combined population of 900 million. If the imperialists insist on launching a third world war, it is certain that several hundred million more will turn to socialism, and then there will not be much room left on earth for the imperialists; it is also likely that the whole structure of imperialism will utterly collapse." Mao embraces the culture of war. As he explains in the chapter on Classes and Class Struggle, violence is to be directed at the enemy, "all those in league with imperialism - the warlords, the bureaucrats, the comprador class, the big Landlord class and the reactionary section of the intelligentsia attached to them." "After the enemies with guns have been wiped out, there will still be enemies without guns; they are bound to struggle desperately against us, and we must never regard these enemies lightly. If we do nor now raise and understand the problem in this way, we shall commit the gravest mistakes." In his chapter on Socialism and Communism" Mao tries to distinguish between authoritarian (culture of war) measures against opponents of socialism, while making possible democracy (culture of peace) for most of the people: "The People's democratic dictatorship uses two methods. Towards the enemy, it uses the method of dictatorship, that is, for as long a period of time as is necessary it does not let them take part in political activities and compels them to obey the law of the People's Government and to engage in labour and, through labour, transform themselves into new men. Towards the people, on the contrary, it uses the method not of compulsion but of democracy, that is, it must necessarily let them take part in political activities and does not compel them to do this or that, but uses the method of democracy in educating and persuading them." Certainly the Chinese Revolution was violent, as were other revolutions before it. And certainly his statement is consistent with those of Marx and Engels, beginning with the Communist Manifesto and going through Anti-Dühring in which they describe violence as the "midwife of history." Is it possible, as Mao suggests, that the revolution can adopt culture of war violence against the capitalists and their sympathizers at the same time as culture of peace democratic procedures for the people? Isn't this contradictory? There are aspects of the culture of war such as authoritarian structure, belief in the efficacy of violence, and secrecy that cannot be so easily differentiated. Either they are adopted or not. Given its policy of war communism, it seems that socialist China has been unable to escape authoritarian and secretive governance with reliance on violence or the threat of violence to maintain power. Unlike the Soviet Union, China has apparently avoided getting into an arms race with the capitalist countries. So far, instead of devoting its industry to war production, it has relied on the enormous size of the Red Army to ensure national defense. As Mao says in his chapter on Relations between the Army and the People, "Every comrade must be helped to understand that as long as we rely on the people, believe firmly in the inexhaustible creative power of the masses and hence trust and identify ourselves with them, we can surmount any difficulty, and no enemy can crush us while we can crush any enemy." Because of its reliance on the culture of war, it is difficult to see how China can escape from the collapse that came to the culture of war in the Soviet Union..
|
Issues Revolutionary socialist culture of peace Education for nonviolence and democracy Sustainable development for all Women's equality vs patriarchy Democratic participation vs authoritarianism Tolerance and solidarity vs enemy images Psychology for revolutionaries Winning Conflict by Nonviolence
Soviet Union
Freire: |