|
Marx: On Alienation, 1844 | Its relation to a Culture of Peace for the 21st Century |
Sources
Marx and Engels:
Marx and Engels:
Engels:
Engels:
Marx, Engels, Lenin:
Lenin:
Lenin:
Trotsky:
Mao:
Mao and Fidel:
Guevara:
Hall and Winston:
Fanon: Cabral: National Liberation and Culture
|
Marx was writing at the beginning of the industrial revolution and he saw clearly the situation that continues to this day. As he would express later in the Communist Manifesto, "the feudal system of industry, under which industrial production was monopolized by closed guilds" had been pushed aside and "the manufacturing system took its place." As a result the relation of a worker to his product had changed. In the old system, the worker produced a finished product, and he could be proud of it and paid for it. But under the new system of capitalism, products are produced by machines, and the worker may never see the final finished product. And rather than being paid for the products he produces, the worker is paid an hourly wage. Marx called this "estranged labor" Under capitalism, the products of labor no longer belong to the worker; instead they belong to the capitalist. Paradoxically the better the worker produces, the richer he makes the capitalist, and the richer he makes the capitalist the more the capitalist has power over him. Since his wage labor is bought and sold (unlike the situation under feudalism) the worker himself has become a commodity under capitalism. Marx explains why he calls this "alienation" in his 1844 essay, "The worker becomes poorer the more wealth he produces, the more his production increases in power and extent. The worker becomes an ever cheaper commodity the more commodities he produces ... the object that labour produces, its product, stands opposed to it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer ... All these consequences are contained in this characteristic, that the worker is related to the product of labour as to an alien object." Not only the worker, but also the capitalist is alienated under capitalism. At the end of the Marx's manuscript, he promises to deal with the alienation of the "non-worker" but the manuscript was never finished. Marx became a revolutionary because he came to believe that capitalism could not be reformed. In the end, capitalism could only create alienation and estrangement. As he describes: there is an "essential connection between private property, greed, the separation of labour, capital and landed property, exchange and competition, value and the devaluation of man, monopoly, and competition, etc. - the connection between this entire system of estrangement and the money system." Marx did not imagine that alienation could occur under socialism. Nor was it recognized by the Soviets, even at the end. Living in the Soviet Union in the 1970's and 1980's I was amazed to find that no one even knew the Russian word for alienation (utrezhdenie), let alone could they discuss its significance for their country. But the evidence of alienation was all around. Most of the Soviet people felt alienated from the government and from the results of the work that they were doing from day to day. The Communist Party was seen as an alien, undemocratic force. The economy was dedicated primarily to the arms race. Trade unions were bureaucratic for the most part. Most of the media was filled with propaganda. There was little hope for democratic participation. Only in the last few years was there talk of "workers control."
Soviet alienation was recognized in the analysis by Joe Slovo, writing from the standpoint of the South African Communist Party. As Slovo insisted, to survive as a viable, long-term alternative to capitalism, socialism must involve people in decision-making, not only at the level of government, but also at the level of production. Democratic participation, in the full sense of its meaning, is essential.
|
Issues Revolutionary socialist culture of peace Education for nonviolence and democracy Sustainable development for all Women's equality vs patriarchy Democratic participation vs authoritarianism Tolerance and solidarity vs enemy images Psychology for revolutionaries Winning Conflict by Nonviolence
Soviet Union
Freire: |